|
|
Risk management
AECI’s focus is on the proactive identification,
assessment and management of risk attributable
to the nature of our business, as we cannot
eliminate risk completely. Effective risk management
is regarded as pivotal to the achievement of
strategic goals in a sustainable manner. The proper
understanding and management of risk enhances
certainty and security for employees, customers
and other stakeholders. We are better informed,
more decisive and the quality of and confidence in
decision making is improved.
The Board is responsible for the risk management
process and is assisted in its responsibilities by the
Risk Committee. The day-to-day responsibilities
for risk management, and the design and
implementation of appropriate processes to
manage risk, reside with management.
The Risk Committee approves the risk strategy
and the policies that are formulated and
implemented by the Executive Committee and
Senior Management. This system assists the
Board in discharging its responsibility for ensuring
that the wide range of risks associated with all of
the Group’s operations are managed effectively
in support of the creation and preservation of
stakeholder wealth and well-being. Full reviews
of the risk control and disclosure processes are
undertaken regularly.
The Group Risk Officer is primarily responsible for
establishing, updating and maintaining the Group
risk framework based on internationally recognised
standards, providing guidance, supporting and
coordinating the identification and documentation
of risk areas Group-wide and implementing the risk
management system.
The Internal Audit function plays a pivotal
role in providing assurance to the Board on
the effectiveness of the risk management
process. Where shortcomings are identified,
these are addressed as part of the continual
improvement of the risk management process
and assurance framework.
Where a risk is assessed as material based on
AECI’s risk capacity, risk appetite and risk limits,
it is reported to and reviewed by Senior
management and the Executive Committee as
part of the risk management escalation process.
This enables the prioritisation of risk management
activities within the Group.
In conducting its annual review of the effectiveness
of risk management, the Board considers the key
findings from the ongoing monitoring and reporting
process and independent assurance reports. The
Board also takes into account material changes and
trends in the risk profile and considers whether the
control systems adequately support the Group’s
ability to achieve its strategic objectives. The Board
receives assurance from regular internal audit reports
and, where considered necessary, from other reports
on risk and internal control throughout the Group.
PROCESS
AECI’s risk management process comprises both
bottom-up and top-down elements and follows
a holistic approach in identifying, analysing,
evaluating, treating, monitoring and reviewing risks.
The bottom-up identification and prioritisation
process is supported by workshops with the
management teams of the Group’s businesses. The
top-down element involves management at AECI
Head Office level. This ensures that potential risks
are discussed at the top management level and
are included in the subsequent reporting process,
if found to be relevant. With this process, together
with the enhanced risk management software
currently being implemented, AECI ensures that
the management of risks is an integral part of
its corporate governance system and that risk
management is integrated into its day-to-day
business activities.
The risk analysis is depicted on a 5 x 5 risk rating
scale consisting of potential impact and estimated
probability. The potential impacts are minor,
moderate, serious, major or severe and are
in turn linked to a qualitative and quantitative
residual risk value. The estimated probability is
based on the following:
| › |
almost certain = monthly basis; |
| › |
likely = once in one year; |
| › |
possible = once in three years; |
| › |
unlikely = once in five years; |
| › |
rare = more than five years. |
The Board is satisfied as to the integrity of
the ongoing process for identifying, evaluating
and managing significant risks and that, where
weaknesses are identified, these are addressed
promptly within the Group and its operations.
PROGRESS IN 2012
In 2012, AECI’s already well-developed and
comprehensive risk management framework
was further refined and entrenched across our
businesses and support functions. As was the case
in 2011 the output of these efforts was used,
inter alia, to determine material issues for inclusion
and discussion in this integrated report.
Two key aspects in the risk management
environment were the focus of attention in 2012:
| 1. |
Embedding an improved risk culture across our
organisation enabling employees, management
and Executives, individually and collectively,
in taking informed decisions. The risk culture will
continue to be entrenched in 2013 and includes
the following: |
| |
| › |
distinct and consistent tone from the top and
across all levels of management in respect of
risk taking and mitigation; |
| › |
commitment to ethical principles; |
| › |
common, Group-wide acceptance of the
importance of continual risk management; |
| › |
the transparent and timely flow of risk-related
information top-down and bottom-up within
the Group; |
| › |
encouragement of risk event reporting and
active learning from mistakes and near misses; |
| › |
ensuring that risk management skills and
knowledge are valued, encouraged and
developed; and |
| › |
sufficient diversity of perspective, values
and beliefs to ensure that the status quo is
challenged consistently and rigorously. |
|
| 2. |
Streamlining the risk management process
whilst ensuring it remains effective and an
integral part of the organisation’s day-to-day
business activities. |
| |
As we strive to reach our desired state of risk
maturity, we identified the need to automate the
risk management system. Under the guidance
of the Group Risk Officer, a risk management
system was selected and is being implemented
Group-wide. The benefits expected include: |
| |
| › |
improved risk management process disciplines; |
| › |
automation and streamlining of risk reporting
requirements; |
| › |
improved accuracy, consistency and efficiency
in reporting; |
| › |
increased transparency and visibility of the
risk environment; |
| › |
enhanced standardisation in reporting across
all Group businesses and corporate functions; |
| › |
automated contingency plans and escalation
procedures; and |
| › |
improved ownership of the risk management
process. |
|
| |
AECI’s progress to risk maturity is presented
schematically below. |

ASSURANCE
Management sets standards and implements
systems of risk management and internal control
aimed at reducing the risk of error or loss in a
cost-effective manner. The Company’s Internal
Audit function appraises the Group companies’
internal control and reports on this to the Audit
Committee. The management of each operating
business submits an annual Letter of Assurance to
the Audit Committee of the Company affirming that
the internal control in entities for which they have
responsibility is adequate for their operations.
For sustainability reporting, independent external
limited assurance is currently obtained on selected
indicators as set out in the Independent assurance report on selected sustainability information.
A combined assurance model in line with King III
requirements is being enhanced to ensure that all
risks identified are subjected to the appropriate
level of control and are assured by internal and
external providers as appropriate.
MATERIALITY
One of the principles that underlie the process of
preparing an integrated report is to determine which
issues the Company’s various stakeholders would
wish to see reported; in other words, what are the
material issues that should be included in a report
and which issues are peripheral and therefore
should be excluded. The diversity of businesses
in the AECI Group and the corresponding diversity
of stakeholders sometimes makes it difficult to
determine which issues pass the test of materiality.
For the purposes of this integrated report,
management has again chosen to use the
Company’s risk management framework as a
guide to materiality. From the risk identification
process, nine main material issues have been
determined. The table below provides a short
description of each of these, along with the primary
stakeholders to whom the issue pertains. Each is
then linked to relevant strategic pillars that support
AECI’s approach to managing these material issues.
The strategic pillars on which AECI bases its
current business activities and future growth are
summarised as follows:
| › |
a cost base that is globally competitive and
continually revised and improved; |
| › |
world-class technology; |
| › |
customer-centric, value-adding service that
is unique or innovative; and |
| › |
excellence, professionalism and good
governance/compliance in all areas of business. |
| MATERIAL ISSUES IDENTIFIED |
|
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS |
|
STRATEGIC PILLARS |
| The management of safety, health
and environmental issues in
accordance with the Group’s values. |
|
Customers, employees,
communities, regulators. |
|
World-class technology; excellence,
professionalism and good
governance/compliance in all areas
of business. |
| The spectrum of competitors and
customer trends; these include both
local and international players and
changing customer requirements
in the areas of cost, quality, service
and technology. |
|
Customers, technology
partners, business
partners. |
|
World-class technology; a cost base
that is globally competitive and
continually revised and improved;
customer-centric, value-adding
service that is unique or innovative. |
| Economic conditions and
industry trends; these include
potentially recessionary conditions,
movements in foreign exchange
rates and commodity prices, and
changing trends in the mining and
manufacturing sectors in different
geographic regions. |
|
Customers, shareholders,
investors and financiers,
business partners. |
|
A cost base that is globally
competitive and continually revised
and improved. |
| Access to and retention of
skilled resources. |
|
Employees, business
partners, regulators,
shareholders, investors
and financiers. |
|
Excellence, professionalism and
good governance/compliance in all
areas of business. |
| Labour and political stability. |
|
Customers, employees,
suppliers, communities,
investors and financiers. |
|
Excellence, professionalism and
good governance/compliance in all
areas of business. |
| Transformation to achieve the
benefits of diversity and to grow
sustainably. |
|
Customers, suppliers,
employees, regulators,
shareholders, investors
and financiers. |
|
Excellence, professionalism and
good governance/compliance in all
areas of business. |
| Information Technology (“IT”)
network security. |
|
Customers, suppliers,
employees, regulators. |
|
World-class technology; excellence,
professionalism and good
governance/compliance in all areas
of business. |
| Technology and production processes,
particularly with respect to quality,
reliability and the avoidance of
obsolescence, product liability and
excessive costs. |
|
Customers, suppliers,
technology partners,
business partners,
investors and financiers. |
|
World-class technology; excellence,
professionalism and good
governance/compliance in all areas
of business. |
| Compliance with legislation
and standards. |
|
Regulators, employees,
communities, investors
and financiers. |
|
Excellence, professionalism and
good governance/compliance in all
areas of business. |
|